Online motor current signature analysis

Read the motor and driven load through the current they draw.

ConditionCore uses Motor Current Analysis (MCA) as its product-facing label for online motor current signature analysis, commonly abbreviated MCSA. The workflow is designed to accept three-channel motor-feeder line-current waveforms and spectra, preserve the motor, feeder, supply, drive, speed, slip and load context, then compare qualified signatures with the rest of the machine evidence.

Illustrative line-current sensors installed on three insulated motor-feeder conductors beside a guarded drive.
Illustrative field-practice image. Not site measurement evidence.

Motor Current Analysis (MCA)

An electrical signature needs motor and supply context.

For an energized three-phase induction motor, keep the feeder, acquisition method, supply type, speed, slip, load and baseline attached before comparing signatures.

Evidence
Three-channel motor-feeder line-current waveform and signature
Qualify
CT setup, sample rate, supply, speed, slip, load and baseline
Can support
Electrical or electromechanical condition hypothesis at motor-system scope
Visual context only. Assessment uses the customer-supplied record. Scope: online electrical signature analysis for energized three-phase induction motors in the ISO 20958 context, not offline motor-circuit analysis. Motor-feeder data collection must follow the site electrical-safety programme and be performed by qualified personnel.

Illustrative online signature workflow

Illustrative · not a customer result

Keep every current signature tied to its operating state.

Online current data becomes defensible evidence only when acquisition method, supply type, motor configuration, speed, load and a comparable baseline travel with it.

MTR-2 · three-phase induction motor Line-fed · 50 Hz · 4-pole · 1,482 rpm 72% load · stable interval · three CT channels
Motor-current waveformIllustrative · L1 / time
Illustrative online motor-current waveformA stable current waveform acquired while the motor is energized. Interpretation requires the electrical supply and mechanical operating state.
Current-signature detailReference / current · normalized
Illustrative motor-current signature comparisonA matched current signature shows change near a configured slip-related sideband family. The pattern is a candidate feature, not a fault declaration.(1−2s)f₁f₁(1+2s)f₁

Qualified observation

A configured sideband family changed against a matched baseline.

This supports a targeted review, not a broken-rotor-bar declaration. Check phase voltage when available, load stability, speed or slip, motor design, vibration response and the driven machine before assigning cause.

Scope: online electrical signature analysis for energized three-phase induction motors, consistent with ISO 20958. This is not offline motor-circuit analysis. Line supply, VFD control and switching, voltage quality, driven-load modulation and acquisition settings can all shape the signature. Motor-feeder data collection must follow the site electrical-safety programme and be performed by qualified personnel. Installed acquisition hardware or de-energized installation is preferred where feasible.

Data in

The context required for comparison.

Motor current is a machine-system response. Supply distortion, drive switching, motor design, speed, slip and driven-load variation can move or create spectral features. A current signature supports a hypothesis; it does not pinpoint GBX-2 or confirm a rotor, bearing or insulation fault by itself. This workflow follows the ISO 20958 scope for energized three-phase induction motors. Other motor and drive types require method-specific acquisition and interpretation.

  • Three-channel motor-feeder line current
  • Current spectrum and demodulated spectrum
  • Line voltage, when available
  • Measured speed, slip and load
  • Motor nameplate, poles and connection
  • Feeder, current-transformer, sample and VFD metadata

What it can reveal

What the measurement can support.

Rotor condition

Assess current-signature features that may be consistent with rotor-bar or end-ring change.

Air-gap eccentricity

Test expected signature families against motor design, speed, slip and load.

Supply and channel condition

Retain channel and available voltage context before interpreting imbalance or distortion.

Drive influence

Qualify possible VFD switching and control influence before assigning machine cause.

Load modulation

Relate torque and driven-load modulation to the connected motor, gearbox, pump or fan.

Cross-domain checks

Compare electrical signatures with vibration, thermal, ultrasonic and oil evidence without treating them as equal votes.

How ConditionCore uses it

From source data to a qualified observation.

Rotor, air-gap, supply and driven-load patterns in motor current, qualified by drive, speed, slip and load.

  1. Acquire

    Retain raw line current, available voltage, channel mapping, feeder point, current-transformer setup and sample settings.

  2. Qualify

    Retain line or VFD operation, motor data, sampling setup, speed, slip and load.

  3. Compare

    Assess repeatable signature change against a matched electrical and operating reference.

  4. Correlate

    Test rotor, air-gap, supply or driven-load hypotheses against the rest of the machine evidence.

Common questions

Motor Current Analysis (MCA), in practice.

See the controls required for a trustworthy comparison.

What does Motor Current Analysis mean on this site?

ConditionCore uses Motor Current Analysis (MCA) as its product-facing label for online motor current signature analysis, commonly abbreviated MCSA. ISO 20958 uses the broader term electrical signature analysis. This is distinct from de-energized Motor Circuit Analysis, which is also shortened to MCA.

What can motor-current signatures help reveal?

Qualified signatures can support hypotheses involving rotor bars or end rings, air-gap eccentricity, supply or phase condition, drive effects, motor loading and mechanical torque modulation reflected through the driven train.

Can Motor Current Analysis identify a gearbox fault by itself?

No. A driven-load change can modulate motor current, but current data usually cannot localize the physical source in the gearbox. Matched vibration, thermal, ultrasonic, oil and operating evidence are needed to test the mechanical explanation.

Can motor current analysis be used with VFD-fed motors?

Potentially, but the drive output frequency, control state, switching environment and matched reference must be retained. A threshold developed for a line-fed motor must not be transferred without validation.

Does motor current analysis replace vibration analysis?

No. Motor current adds an electrical and drive-train view. Vibration usually provides stronger mechanical localization. Their value increases when each is allowed to test the other without being treated as an equal vote.

First machine review

Start with the machine that is changing.

Share one changing asset and the files you already have. We will confirm what is usable, what remains uncertain and which next check is most valuable.

Request a machine review